OpenEvidence
Medical search and clinical decision-support AI that synthesizes peer-reviewed evidence for clinicians.
Last updated: June 5, 2026
Back to directoryAI research assistant for literature review workflows, including systematic reviews.
Research teams that need structured literature search and extraction support.
Compare within workflow: Clinical evidence and questions · comparison shortlist · source index
Product-specific review. These product-specific signals summarize what the cited sources imply before treating Elicit as safe for a local clinical, operational, or research workflow.
| Regulatory / FDA | Treat as literature-review and evidence-synthesis workflow software rather than patient-care decision support. |
|---|---|
| Privacy | Use de-identified literature and project materials unless enterprise terms explicitly cover confidential or patient-related documents. |
| Evidence | Validate search recall, screening decisions, extraction fields, source quotes, and PRISMA-style audit trail on the review topic before relying on outputs. |
| Workflow | Best for systematic-review teams that keep human reviewer reconciliation, protocol documentation, and final appraisal outside the automation. |
Elicit describes AI-enabled systematic reviews with search, screening, and data extraction workflows, and support materials distinguish systematic-review workflows from broader research-agent sourcing.
Not for: Final systematic-review conclusions without PRISMA-style methods and human validation.
Use these links to confirm current claims, terms, regulatory status, pricing, and deployment requirements.